SPECIAL NOTICE: BLACKLIST.AERO DOESN’T PARTICIPATE IN COMPETITIVE WARS!

After the publication of the article "NEXUS - PLEXUS, WHERE ARE YOU?" we have received a very strong positive response from participants of the aviation market. Aviation professionals began to share information with us, which further enhanced the picture of natural fraud arranged by the hero of our article.
However, we also noticed another trend: some market participants began to perceive BLACKLIST.AERO publications as an opportunity to get even with their competitors.
At various times, we were repeatedly approached with offers to publish material in relation to a particular company, hinting that this could be financially beneficial for us. And it invariably got rejected. However, now, after the publication of an article about the group of companies NEXUS, PLEXUS, BURAQ and BAROQUE related to Abdullah Al-Sayed, the number of such “offers” has increased significantly.
In this regard, we categorically declare: BLACKLIST.AERO DOESN’T TAKE PART IN COMPETITIVE WARS ON ANYONE’S SIDE. The Registry was and remains “ABOVE THE MARKET”.
I would like to very clearly and unambiguously set the record straight on: The Global Aviation Register of Defaulter companies BLACKLIST.AERO was created to clear the aviation market from defaulters and fraudsters. And any of our publications and actions are subordinated to the achievement of this main goal only.
We are well aware that, given the harshness and even “scandalousness” (as it's seen by a particularly sophisticated and refined public) of our actions towards fraudsters and defaulters, someone may try to use BLACKLIST.AERO for their own selfish purposes.
So it was and so it will be with any mass media. We are well aware of the fine line between defending socially important interests and playing up someone's selfish motives. That is why BLACKLIST.AERO will never become a “shitbox” for market participants to publish dirt on each other.
Any information that we receive from our sources, we will use only to achieve our main goal. Therefore, despite all our sincere gratitude for the information you’re providing (which we check and double-check), please do not expect this information to be used exactly the way you want it.
I also want to emphasize that, according to the rules of the Registry, there is a clear division of responsibility between Claimant for each specific case and the Registry administration. Namely:
1. Claimant signs the Claimant Agreement, according to which he is fully legally responsible for the veracity of the case he creates in relation to his defaulter.
2. The BLACKLIST.AERO registry bears legal and moral responsibility for its public and paralegal actions in relation to the defaulter specified in the case.
3. IMPORTANT: Claimant cannot dictate to the BLACKLIST.AERO administration what actions to take with respect to the defaulter and what not.
4. IMPORTANT: Claimant cannot “order and pay” any public and paralegal actions. There is a procedure that we follow until the case is published in the Registry. This procedure is the same for ALL cases. Everything else is up to our inspiration and passion.
I hope these clarifications will become exhaustive for all participants in the aviation market. Thank you in advance for your understanding and support!
When a loved one requires urgent medical evacuation, families are often forced to act fast — emotionally and financially. In July 2024, one such family contracted EMS Air Ambulance & Medical Repatriation Ltd, a UK-based company offering bedside-to-bedside repatriation. What followed was not just a logistical failure — it was a masterclass in how carefully drafted contracts can trap vulnerable clients and make recovery of funds nearly impossible.
Another subsidiary of Avia Solutions Group—the Slovak ACMI operator AirExplore—will soon cease to exist as an independent company. BLACKLIST.AERO was informed of this by a source within the company.
Global Aviation Register of Defaulter companies BLACKLIST.AERO is now an officially registered trademark across the countries of the European Union. This week, the European Union Intellectual Property Office finally issued our long-awaited certificate!
The year 2025 turned out to be one of the most difficult for aviation as a whole. One can talk endlessly about the heavy legacy of the post-COVID era, which manifested itself in a global disruption of supply chains and, as a consequence, a shortage of new aircraft and spare parts, delays in maintenance, and so on. Added to this were geopolitical risks—at times it seems the whole world wants to fight more than to create. We are living through a turning point, where the old world order has already been completely destroyed, while the new one has not yet taken on any clear shape. Aviation, in this process, is a litmus test reflecting all of these dynamics.